Highlights for the 14-week fourth quarter ended
Highlights for the 53-week full year ended
|
(1) |
Restaurant-level EBITDA and pro forma net income are non-GAAP measures. For reconciliations of restaurant-level EBITDA and pro forma net income to GAAP net income and discussions of why we consider them useful, see the "Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures" accompanying this release. |
|
Fourth Quarter 2012 Financial Results
Revenue increased
Comparable restaurant sales increased 5.2% during the quarter for the
13-week period ended
Total restaurant operating costs decreased as a percent of revenues to 80.3% in the fourth quarter of 2012 from 82.2% in the fourth quarter of 2011, driven largely by operating leverage obtained from the extra operating week in the fourth quarter of 2012, as well as an improvement in restaurant operating costs, partially offset by expected increases in cost of sales and occupancy costs at non-comparable restaurants.
Net income available to common stockholders for the fourth quarter of
2012 was
Pro forma net income increased 141.9% to
During the fourth quarter, one new Chuy's restaurant was opened in
2013 Outlook
The Company previously issued guidance for fiscal year 2013. Diluted net
income per share is expected to range between
On a comparable calendar week basis, the Company expects its reported
first quarter 2013 comparable sales growth percentage to be consistent
with its annual guidance. However, due to the 53rd week in fiscal 2012,
there is a one-week calendar shift in the comparison of the fiscal first
quarter of 2013 compared to the fiscal first quarter of 2012. As a
result of this shift, the week between Christmas and New Year's,
traditionally a high-volume week for the Company's restaurants, will be
replaced with an average-volume week in the first quarter of 2013. The
Company expects this shift to reduce revenues by approximately
Subsequent Event
On
The following definitions apply to these terms as used in this release:
Comparable restaurant sales reflect changes in sales for the comparable group of restaurants over a specified period of time. We consider a restaurant to be comparable in the first full quarter following the 18th month of operations. Changes in comparable sales reflect changes in customer count trends as well as changes in average check.
Average check is calculated by dividing revenue by total entrees sold for a given time period. Average check reflects menu price influences as well as changes in menu mix.
Restaurant-level EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, represents net income plus the sum of general and administrative expenses, the advisory agreement termination fee, the settlement with our former director, restaurant pre-opening costs, depreciation and amortization, interest and taxes.
Conference Call
The Company will host a conference call to discuss financial results for
the fourth quarter of 2012 today at
The conference call can be accessed live over the phone by dialing
800-270-6751 or for international callers by dialing 913-312-9309. A
replay will be available one hour after the call and can be accessed by
dialing 877-870-5176 or 858-384-5517 for international callers; the
passcode is 1405562. The replay will be available until
About Chuy's
Founded in
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this release that are not historical facts,
including, without limitation, those relating to our anticipated
financial performance, are forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Such statements are based upon the current
beliefs and expectations of the management of the Company. Actual
results may vary materially from those contained in forward-looking
statements based on a number of factors including, without limitation,
the actual number of restaurant openings, the sales at the Company's
restaurants, changes in restaurant development or operating costs, such
as food and labor, the Company's ability to leverage its existing
management and infrastructure, changes in restaurant pre-opening
expense, general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, or
our effective tax rate, changes in the number of diluted shares
outstanding, strength of consumer spending, conditions beyond the
Company's control such as weather, natural disasters, disease outbreaks,
epidemics or pandemics impacting the Company's customers or food
supplies, acts of war or terrorism and other factors disclosed from time
to time in the Company's filings with the
|
Chuy's Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Income Statements (In thousands, except share and per share data) |
||||||||||||||||
| Quarter Ended | Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
December 25, | |||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
| Revenue | $ | 46,680 | $ | 33,262 | $ | 172,640 | $ | 130,583 | ||||||||
| Costs and expenses | ||||||||||||||||
| Cost of sales | 12,711 | 9,017 | 46,475 | 36,139 | ||||||||||||
| Labor | 14,928 | 10,980 | 55,223 | 41,545 | ||||||||||||
| Operating | 6,688 | 5,048 | 24,498 | 19,297 | ||||||||||||
| Occupancy | 2,796 | 2,064 | 10,332 | 7,622 | ||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 2,939 | 1,867 | 9,358 | 7,478 | ||||||||||||
| Advisory agreement termination fee | - | - | 2,000 | - | ||||||||||||
| Secondary offering costs | 228 | - | 228 | - | ||||||||||||
| Settlement with former director | - | - | - | 245 | ||||||||||||
| Marketing | 365 | 231 | 1,319 | 964 | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant pre-opening | 469 | 817 | 3,383 | 3,385 | ||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,856 | 1,307 | 6,528 | 4,448 | ||||||||||||
| Total costs and expenses | 42,980 | 31,331 | 159,344 | 121,123 | ||||||||||||
| Income from operations | 3,700 | 1,931 | 13,296 | 9,460 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense | 145 | 1,228 | 5,596 | 4,362 | ||||||||||||
| Income before income taxes | 3,555 | 703 | 7,700 | 5,098 | ||||||||||||
| Income tax expense | 1,000 | 386 | 2,243 | 1,634 | ||||||||||||
| Net Income | 2,555 | 317 | 5,457 | 3,464 | ||||||||||||
| Undistributed earnings allocated to | ||||||||||||||||
| participating interests | - | 313 | 2,171 | 3,423 | ||||||||||||
| Net income available to common | ||||||||||||||||
| stockholders | $ | 2,555 | $ | 4 | $ | 3,286 | $ | 41 | ||||||||
| Net income per common share: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.48 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
| Diluted | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.37 | $ | 0.20 | ||||||||
| Weighted-average shares outstanding: | ||||||||||||||||
| Basic | 15,918,427 | 208,505 | 6,809,576 | 191,166 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted | 16,736,781 | 10,869,992 | 12,893,290 | 10,852,651 | ||||||||||||
|
Chuy's Selected Balance Sheet Data (In thousands) |
|||||||||
|
|
December 25, | ||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 5,855 | $ | 2,827 | |||||
| Total assets | 129,721 | 105,938 | |||||||
| Long-term debt | 5,000 | 55,200 | |||||||
| Total stockholders' equity | 87,463 | 25,627 | |||||||
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures
We prepare our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Within our press release, we make reference to non-GAAP restaurant-level EBITDA, Restaurant-level EBITDA margin, and pro forma net income. Restaurant-level EBITDA represents net income plus the sum of general and administrative expenses, the advisory agreement termination fee, secondary offering costs, the settlement with our former director, restaurant pre-opening costs, depreciation and amortization, interest and taxes. Restaurant-level EBITDA is presented because: (i) the Company believes it is a useful measure for investors to assess the operating performance of our business without the effect of non-cash depreciation and amortization expenses; and (ii) the Company uses restaurant-level EBITDA internally as a benchmark to evaluate its operating performance or compare our performance to that of our competitors. Additionally, the Company presents restaurant-level EBITDA because it excludes the impact of general and administrative expenses, which are not incurred at the restaurant level, and restaurant pre-opening costs, which are non-recurring at the restaurant level. The use of restaurant-level EBITDA thereby enables the Company and its investors to compare operating performance between periods and to compare our operating performance to the performance of the Company's competitors. The measure is also widely used within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant level productivity, efficiency and performance. The use of restaurant-level EBITDA as a performance measure permits a comparative assessment of our operating performance relative to our performance based on our GAAP results, while isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. The Company presents restaurant-level EBITDA margin for the same reasons it presents restaurant-level EBITDA.
Pro forma net income represents our net income plus the sum of the net
reduction in our interest expense and the reduction in our management
fees and expenses as a result of our IPO and the application of the net
proceeds of the IPO to repay
The following table includes a reconciliation of net income to restaurant-level EBITDA (in thousands):
| Quarter Ended | Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income as reported | $ | 2,555 | $ | 317 | $ | 5,457 | $ | 3,464 | ||||||||||||
| Income tax provision | 1,000 | 386 | 2,243 | 1,634 | ||||||||||||||||
| Interest expense | 145 | 1,228 | 5,596 | 4,362 | ||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 2,939 | 1,867 | 9,358 | 7,478 | ||||||||||||||||
| Advisory agreement termination fee | - | - | 2,000 | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Secondary offering costs | 228 | - | 228 | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Settlement with former director | - | - | - | 245 | ||||||||||||||||
| Restaurant pre-opening expenses | 469 | 817 | 3,383 | 3,385 | ||||||||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 1,856 | 1,307 | 6,528 | 4,448 | ||||||||||||||||
| Restaurant-level EBITDA | $ | 9,192 | $ | 5,922 | $ | 34,793 | $ | 25,016 | ||||||||||||
| Restaurant-level EBITDA margin (1) | 19.7 | % | 17.8 | % | 20.2 | % | 19.2 | % | ||||||||||||
|
(1) |
Restaurant-level EBITDA margin is calculated by dividing restaurant-level EBITDA by revenue. |
|
The following is a reconciliation of GAAP net income and net income per share to pro forma net income and pro forma net income per share (in thousands):
| Quarter Ended | Fiscal Year Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||
| Net income as reported | $ | 2,555 | $ | 317 | $ | 5,457 | $ | 3,464 | ||||||||||||
| Interest expense as reported (1) | 145 | 1,228 | 5,596 | 4,362 | ||||||||||||||||
| Pro forma interest expense based upon | ||||||||||||||||||||
| reduced debt balance (2) | (107 | ) | (107 | ) | (428 | ) | (428 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Management fees and expenses (3) | - | 94 | 2,094 | 373 | ||||||||||||||||
| Settlement with former director | ||||||||||||||||||||
| and one-time bonus to management (4) | - | - | - | 1,264 | ||||||||||||||||
| Secondary offering costs (5) | 228 | - | 228 | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Incremental public costs (6) | - | (338 | ) | (805 | ) | (1,350 | ) | |||||||||||||
| Income tax expense on adjustments (7) | (146 | ) | (88 | ) | (2,073 | ) | (1,162 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Pro forma net income | $ | 2,675 | $ | 1,106 | $ | 10,069 | $ | 6,523 | ||||||||||||
| Net income per share - pro forma: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic - pro forma | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.63 | $ | 0.41 | ||||||||||||
| Diluted - pro forma | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.60 | $ | 0.40 | ||||||||||||
| Weighted-average shares outstanding-pro forma: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Basic - pro forma (8) | 15,918,427 | 15,918,425 | 15,918,427 | 15,901,086 | ||||||||||||||||
| Diluted - pro forma (8) | 16,736,781 | 16,530,340 | 16,645,245 | 16,512,999 | ||||||||||||||||
Notes to reconciliation of GAAP net income to non-GAAP pro forma net income:
|
1. |
Reflects the adjustment to eliminate the historical interest expense for all periods presented that were based upon actual outstanding balances before the application of the net proceeds from our IPO. |
||||
|
2. |
Reflects interest expense assuming our current post-IPO long-term
debt balance of |
||||
|
a. |
an unused facility fee on the unfunded |
||||
|
b. |
a lower annual amortization of deferred loan costs of
approximately |
||||
|
3. |
Reflects the elimination of the management fees and expenses paid
and reimbursed to |
||||
|
4. |
Reflects the elimination of one-time charges in 2011 for the
settlement with former director of |
||||
|
5. |
Reflects the elimination of the offering expenses associated with the follow-on offering of secondary shares of the Company. |
||||
|
6. |
Reflects an estimate of recurring incremental legal, accounting, insurance and other compliance costs we expect to incur as a public company for the periods prior to being a public company. |
||||
|
7. |
Reflects the tax expense associated with normalizing the tax rate to 30%, which reflects our estimated long-term effective tax rate. |
||||
|
8. |
Reflects (i) 6,708,332 additional shares of common stock issued in
the IPO, (ii) the repurchase by the Company of 1,655,662 shares of
its common and preferred stock on |
||||
Chuy's
Investor Relations
investors@chuys.com
Source: Chuy's
News Provided by Acquire Media